TEC: Evidence Based Therapeutics
Therapeutics Education Collaboration
Medication Mythbusters – Home of the Best Science (BS) Medicine Podcast

Episode 163: How to analyse a meta-analysis and at the end not need analysis – PART II

In episode 163, Mike and James race to the end of their in-depth look at critical appraisal and as they get to the end their final kick is at some of the problems seen with meta-analyses. We discuss examples of how meta-analyses sometime go wrong and we do our best to make them right – with varying degrees of success.

Show notes

1) Glucose lowering meta-analysis

Ann Intern Med 2009;151:394-403

2) Beta-blocker meta-analysis

Lancet 2005;366:1545–53

3) PSA screening

BMJ 2010;341:c4543 doi:10.1136/bmj.c4543

3) Statin meta-analyses on mortality effect in primary prevention 

BMJ 2009;338:b2376

RR 0.88 (0.81-0.96) 

Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1024-31

RR 0.91 (0.83-1.01)

Arch Intern Med 2005;165:725-30

RR 0.86 (0.76 -0.99) 

Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2307-13

RR 0.92 (0.84-1.01) 

J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1769-81

RR 0.93 (0.87-0.99)

4) Back pain meta-analysis

Cochrane CD000335

Listening to this episode is for premium podcast members only. If you already have a membership, login to your account. If you aren't yet a premium subscriber, sign up today!


BS Medicine Podcast

The 2024 MEME Conference – May 24-25, 2024


Making Evidence Matter For Everyone | May 24 & 25, 2024
From the clinicians who brought you the Best Science Medicine Course and the Meds Conference, as well as the BS Medicine Podcast and Tools for Practice




Check it out at nutritionproposition.com and think about picking up a copy on Amazon. All the evidence you ever wanted about nutrition and the only nutrition book that won’t tell you what to eat.


BedMed: The High Blood Pressure Study

This pragmatic trial is now recruiting in BC. Make a difference and get involved with pragmatic trials (www.pragmatictrials.ca)

PEER Tools


Recent Posts